Monday, 13 November 2017

Star Wars: The Last Jedi & Star Trek: Discovery


Sonequa Martin Green has been great to watch in her new role as Michael Burnham in Netflix's Star Trek Discovery which has just gone on hiatus after episode 9. Discovery has reinvigorated Strar Trek with fresh new technologies like spore drive, a racially diverse cast, interesting twists and turns in the narrative. It will be back in January 2018. Looking forward to the shows return next year. For Sci-Fi buffs that means next on the calendar is the much anticipated debut of Rian Johnson's rendition of Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Anyone who has seen the movie Brick or Loopers will know to expect the unexpected in the Last Jedi. Rian will surely not disappoint.

I've just finished watching Season 1 and 2 of Stranger Things on Netflix. The Duffer brothers have done a remarkable job with this one. What impressed the most about this series is the authenticity. When they show the upside down for the first time, the feeling you get is how could they have known about this place? If you've ever been there in a nightmare or two as kid you'll know they're not making this stuff up lol, although it is stylized and adopted for television, falling ash, scary creatures and all. The way the directors integrate the two dimensions is intriguing and quite remarkable, interesting to watch. Atari game consoles but no mention of the Commodore 64? The C64 was also really popular back then. I'm looking forward to season 3.  



Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Game of Thrones Season 7

Game of Thrones (GOT) was solid this season. Season 7 is the closest an audience can have of that magical feeling you get when you are at the cinema. Watching a movie at the cinema is an immersive experience. The big screen, 3D and surround sound, base in the speakers and darkened space are the props that aid in drawing the audience into the unfolding story. The audience feels transported, it gets lost in the dialogue and movement on the screen. If that feeling of immersion takes place when you’re at home watching a television series on the small screen then the quality of what you’re watching must be exceptional, because it’s become powerful enough to teleport you even without the aid of a theatre. GOT Season 7 is right there, in that sweet spot.

After watching the first 3 episodes of GOT, I decided to set aside the series, haphazardly dodge spoilers and with the utmost discipline opted to wait until all seven episodes were on the pvr. Then one lazy afternoon I fired up the popcorn and binged on all four remaining episodes at one go. It was worth the wait.

What made GOT unique was the layers, layers, layers brought about by the trials, tribulations, reprieves and triumphs of all the main characters as they interacted with one another in previous seasons. This history added weight to every scene, every conversation and confrontation. Eyes in the room could be seen tearing up as Tyrion argued to save the day bearing out his innocence and plight to a seemingly touched but unrepentant Cersei, how far the little big guy had come in this epic tale. He has had such a rough ride, isn't it time Tyrion got some joy, a little glory and someone to fill the void Shae left behind? C'mon now.

Hats off to creators DB Weis and David Beniof, and directors Jeremy Podeswa, Mark Mylod, Matt Shakman and Anthony Taylor, the writers and originator of GOT GRR Martin. Without doubt GOT Season 7, right now, must be one of the best television series on earth and the numbers attest to this. Well done guys. There was definitely no amateur hour we see in new seasons and sequels here. Though I do enjoy watching many diverse series and have favourites the other television series that hits shots on this epic level for me is the Sci-Fi channel's the Expanse. 

There is very little to fault in this season. Even the fight between Arya and Brienne which could not have been easy to choreograph due to the difference in stature, was well done with the right clips, shots and angles as to make it both believable and entertaining.

Here there be dragons...

Finally, the audience had opportunity to see the three mighty dragons in action...and they didn't disappoint. The CGI for the dragons was awesome. The power of those beasts as game changers on the battle field was palpable. What may have been lacking is more meaningful verbal interaction between Daenerys and the dragons. The only word she seems to speak to the dragons is drakarys. This is unfortunate. It’s clear that the dragons are very intelligent and what better way to demonstrate this than through the ability to converse with them, this would come across very nicely especially if she spoke to them in Valerian. They would not speak back of of course, but through mannerisms and gestures they could be shown to respond to these conversations, by showing they can complete complex instructions they would showcase their level of intelligence. For instance Daenerys could be shown giving the dragons instructions on how to stage an attack, elaborate on how it will take place, what to wait for, who to pick out, where each dragon should be, how they would need to avoid the dragon slaying arrows and maybe who to pick off in the field. They could even improvise if it all doesn’t go to plan. A dragon could be instructed to save a specific person and lift them away from danger albeit roughly, or one could act as a decoy so that while being targeted by a large arrow another approaches from behind and lights it up. The intelligence of the dragons would be demonstrated by their ability to carry out intricate battle strategies. Another interesting stage in the evolution of the dragon tale would be the introduction of armor to protect them from the new vulnerabilities, (even from the night kings spear), Daenerys has now identified on the battle field. In the beginning she has taken the dragons to battle as though they are beloved offspring and this has cost her dearly with Drogon speared, Viserion dead and Rhaegal exposed to weapons that could kill him as a result of being lead into forays unprepared. Therefore, the need has arisen for her to transform from doting mother of dragons to the dragon rider commander of combat ready, armored and finely trained military beasts swooping in from the sky. Flying in formation they should be prepared for the military threats they will and might encounter on the field of battle and in the sky. 

Dragons: Powerful, but lacking armor,
untrained for battle and vulnerable 
Before the first battles Daenarys was rather over-confident and naive in that she seemed to believe she was invincible riding on the back of her dragons to the extent that she even wears normal royal garb whilst in battle. It would be nice to see now she has learned from experience she can be struck by arrows and therefore needs to wear some kind of leathery armor and headgear impenetrable to arrows. She may also have learned she cannot just sit complacently atop her dragons as there are times they may need her protection from missiles hurled at her and her ride, consequently she must carry and master a long bow or cross bow which allows her to pick off anyone on the ground who may threaten her dragons, for instance, someone manning the large dragon slaying cross-bows. With practice she could soon realize she has a significant advantage launching arrows from above, even from impossible distances since gravity is on her side she can consequently make surgical strikes from high above where arrows from the ground cannot reach her and dragon fire might endanger not only the enemy but her own troops.

Wearing gowns to war:
Dany must by now realize she must train, dress herself and her dragons
appropriately for dangerous confrontations on the battle field
or risk their lives.
It would be mice to see a dragon she is riding swoop overhead, then turn over horizontally onto its back as she glides over giving her the clear and perfect upside down shot for a specific target far below. She has also learned from experience that if her dragon is struck it will be brought down. While its on the ground she needs to know how to wield a sword of some kind to protect herself and the dragon, preferably a Dothraki arakh. She must repeatedly practice pulling an embedded lance or large arrow in order to gain the muscle strength that allows her to free the dragon quickly enough to return to the skies. In addition to this if they hear of Viserion being ridden by the night king she must strategize how to battle; defend herself and her flying stead in the air, if she is to ensure she has some kind of advantage over the night king and to make sure she does not lose any more of her precious dragons. She has to recognize, after Drogon's injury and losing Viserion, that she cannot go naively with her dragons.into battle ever again. She has to learn to quickly find defenses for unanticipated threats and must learn the requisite skills of a dragon rider to become a kind of dragon riding Joan of Arc of the skies. This growth and maturity would be great for the audience to see.

There were some strong similarities between this season and Lord of the Rings that add to the richness of GOT this season, especially when Jon puts together a team with the sole purpose of capturing a white walker.

Bran Stark is the only character whose role we suddenly don’t understand

Everyone in season 7 seems to blossom, except for Bran.

The question on everyone’s mind is the revelation that Bran may in fact be the night king. This could very well be true. However, personally I don’t think this is true because though it’s a fascinating idea, it is sensational but with very little value after the fact when it comes to the story telling process. I’d say this because the three eyed raven and the king of the white walkers appear to be polar opposites of one another. They are both representative of entities that have reached heights of knowledge and understanding of the magical realm that others have failed to achieve. Technically this means that the deciding battle between the two sides has to be between Bran and the night king. If Bran proves to be the night king then there is no magical equivalency and the story may lose its way. There would be no one  who could realistically take on the night king and have any hope of winning as it would be poor story telling for him to be taken down by someone who is not his magical equal. Bran’s side probably cannot win this war without him because this is not an ordinary war; they do not have the magic of the three eyed raven – it’s like one of those cryptic messages that goes: this magical being can only be killed by a magical being.  If this is true the audience may not have been made fully aware of just how important Bran is to this war. At some point someone like Melisandre has to say the words: even if we win this battle against the white walkers, if there is no one amongst us who can face the night king then all is lost; Bran is the one who has that power.

Bran, by now, so close to the war, should be so powerful that when he appears a place or room appears to grow brighter and warmer; the grass and foliage should appear to rejuvenate in his presence, he should be able to will himself to walk for short periods, be able to draw the ice out of anything and anyone turned into a white walker, warming them up until they hiss with steam back to life. As the night king is impervious to heat, he too by now should be impervious to cold. However, Bran is not blossoming. Bran is losing the war in his mind. Something has gone horribly wrong. The confidence he once had has fled. Schizophrenia has set in. He is petrified of the night king. Even though, as the three eyed raven his magical power should be equal to that of the night king he fails over and over to demonstrate this. He fails to hold his own when he wargs and is spotted by his nemesis, he fails to sense the night king until he is upon him, he fails to prevent the night king from grabbing his arm and marking him. Since these failings have nothing to do with his being weaker it has everything to do with his inability to overcome the terror. Fear has consumed Bran so deeply from his first encounter with the night king that he is beginning to forget himself. It may even be possible that unbeknownst to him and all around him the mark the night king placed on his arm when he was with the children of the forest has been corrupting his spirit, turning his innards to ice. If Bran were to look at himself deeply in a mirror it would appear as though his skin and hair were turning snow white and his eyes crystal blue. The mark is corrupting him so slowly, were he not the three eyed raven Bran would not have survived the cursed touch this long. The mark and his fear should have been dealt with long before this, but it wasn’t. As a result his thoughts are becoming cloudy, he is giving in to a lie, beginning to forget his friends, trying to flee from his duty to protect the others by subconsciously disassociating from Bran Stark on the pretext that he cannot be both Bran Stark and the three eyed raven and this lie too is consuming him.

The night king seems to sense this collapse of Brans resolve, this has boosted his confidence, encouraging him to do the unthinkable, that is, take the three eyed raven head on, as can be seen by how eagerly his head turns to the crows Bran has warged into when he tries to surveil the wall. At some point Bran may see that though his skin appears healthy, when he looks at himself using magic his inner self shows the icy mark the night king placed on him has spread to almost every part of his body. The mark is affecting him as it has infants touched by the night king.  Bran is turning. He is losing affection for his friends and family. He mistakenly believes it’s because he’s becoming the three eyed raven. Even he may not seem to understand that he’s falling under the will of the night king. He can’t see what is happening to him as there are no external symptoms. Nevertheless, if Bran continues to sink into the fear, he will be overwhelmed by it and the mark at which point he may fall completely under the spell of the night king and like the dragon Viserion become………a wight. He would become like one of the lieutenants that command the night king’s white walkers: an instrument of his nemesis instead of his foe. This would be disastrous and could be happening right in the midst of Winterfell. Wouldn’t it be awesome if he actually turned completely at Winterfell, but was able to somehow fight back at some point. Everyone would think he was turning into the night king when in fact he's becoming a wight lieutenant. To add intrigue wafts of icy mist could be seen emerging from the bottom of a door to a room in which Bran is resting. Having turned he would then force the night king out and regain his body to become even more powerful than he was before as the three eyed raven, now no longer afraid of the night king. The battle between the night king and Bran should be epic, much like the appearance of the dragons on the battle field for the first time. For now the contrast between the two is stark, no pun intended. As the night king soars on his dragon, Bran is crippled sinking deeper and deeper into despair on his wheel chair, unable to even hold onto warged ravens in the presence of his foe, his mind is slowly being consumed by cowardice while the night king burns down the wall and marches his army of doom onward. Against this backdrop Bran’s turnaround would be good storytelling.

Bran and the Avatar

Bran is still a scared boy cowering from the night king.
Fear and the mark may stand between him and the man he must become.
Thus far the night king has shown himself to be the rock star of magic on GOT. There appears to be no one who can challenge him. This is a lost opportunity, since by building up a contender the writers would have the audience spoiling for confrontation between the two. It is unlikely that any human being can take the night king on in direct, one on one combat. The only way to win the coming war is to defeat the night king. This alone is likely to be why the three eyed raven is so important. Bran has plenty of unexploited potential on the magic scale. His most powerful trait as the three eyed raven is his ability to enter sage mode and project himself into an avatar. When Bran emerges from his body in the avatar state he is able to travel back in time, influence people there, he is confident and regains his ability to walk and so on. When he enters the avatar state his stature grows such that he seems more of a contender for the night king. The avatar form for him is like a lucid dream in which the physical world around him becomes malleable, in that he can control it with his mind. We see this when he calls out to Ned Stark in the past, who seems to hear him. In the present Bran's avatar could appear like real flesh and bone. Anyone who saw him could touch him and interacted with him and would not be able to tell the difference. This would allow him to join the others more actively and to fight physically in battle. However, it would also allow him to do mysterious GOT style things like appear in a locked room, speak to someone in Dorne, but then be seen in the North, and suddenly stop a sword about to strike down Jon at the Red Keep and so on. In this state where the world is like a dream to him he is the three eyed raven, the master magician who can do almost anything, he could even fly. His will in the avatar state becomes reality and affects everything and everyone he bends his mind toward. He would be perfectly positioned to face the night king. However, he would have one significant weakness; as is the case when he wargs, his physical body becomes vulnerable. Furthermore, he cannot be everywhere at once and will have to sometimes make difficult choices about how and where to apply his unique abilities.

The writers may have some fun leading the audience on by making it
believe this rumour has actually happened.
This avatar issue raises another question, could the magnificent night king the audience sees, not be the night king himself but an avatar? Could this be why he can see Bran in the same state, be why he has not aged an iota in visage despite hundreds of years, why he could not cross the magic imbued in the wall to travel south, why he cannot be burned by fire, why he can be killed and yet reappear? Could the night king, like Bran bound to a wheel chair and the former one eyed raven trapped in overgrown tree roots, be hidden in some icy cave in the midst of a frozen city far north of the wall, surrounded by veins of ice, a pathetic, aged, shriveled up version of himself with astonishing psychic ability. If this is true then defeating the night king on the battle field would not end the war. They might expend huge resources and manage to kill him on the battle field, cheer in triumph at being able to cut him down only to find him appear again unwounded and pissed off. This would happen again and again as they take their best shot and each time they would lose valuable lives until Bran in flesh and bone appearance of his avatar intervenes and stops them. Frozen in the midst of their attack he would then tell them to conserve their strength, because this is not the night king. Bran would explain that the attacks may weaken him slightly but he cannot be killed physically on this battle field, because he's really not here. The night king is hidden in his lair north of the wall and would have to be found and ended there in order to stop him completely. Bran would say to Jon, while I hold him and his armies back here, you will have to send a team to find him wherever he is hidden and slay him there or this war will not end. Arya, a master of infiltration might volunteer for this mission taking her Valerian dagger, a team that consists of the Hound and a few others to the mountain shaped like an arrow. What manner of perils would they find venturing into the clan of the night king that is populated by many babies he has turned over the centuries, where they have evolved a strange life and culture all their own, protect and venerate his withered body as though he were a deity, deeper into the frozen north than anyone in recent times has dared set foot? This in itself could prove to be a dangerous and bone chilling adventure.

When Bran gets it together, while the
night king takes life with the freezing cold
he may restore life with blazing fire...

Bran seems set for one of the most epic transformations toward either good or evil seen on GOT. Hopefully he may turn to face his innermost fears, summon powers unseen before and rise to the challenge the night king. There may need to be a scene where in a surveillance mission Bran's avatar once again strays too close to the night king. The audience will obviously be appalled and terrified as the night king spots him and grabs hold of him once again, but instead of cowering Bran resists, grips the night king by the shoulder and begins to draw the ice out of him to the point where his face begins to look human again before he breaks free of Brans hold and realizes he has a new threat. Bran could take to the air  if not by using his avatar then by riding some magical beast he creates himself the audience did not even know could exist or be revived. He could even fantastically, having brought the night king to the ground during battle dramatically draw the ice out of Viserion and bring him back to the fire breathing beauty he was before. And as hordes of night walkers converge on him he could draw the ice out in circles around him, and by radiating life return them to flesh and bone, freeing them from the night kings hold such that instead of attacking him they instead turn to his side and begin to defend him from other white walkers. There are so many characters endeared to the audience that Bran would be able to use fire to draw out the ice and bring back to life, including the giants like Wun Wun. We have seen fire used to revive on GOT, Bran should be powerful enough to bring this ability to a whole new level in that anyone claimed by the night king, that is, by ice can be seized back by fire; Melisandre would certainly dance a jig or two, that's for sure.

If Bran's control of his avatar exceeds expectations he may
not need to warg to fly..
Bran looks very lonely in season 7. The night king has imprisoned him in fear in a way that reminds me of the way Gandalf was helplessly trapped at the top of Saruman's tower. The audience is waiting for that subtle moment when an insignificant moth or fleeting butterfly flutters into his hand and causes an event that dramatically changes his outlook. If he will confront the night king on magical terms he needs to find some means to overcome the fear and he has to find the magic with which to remove the night king’s mark. This may not just take power, it may also take knowledge and skill that someone like Tarly could help with, perhaps using some of those scrolls and manuscripts freshly lifted form the Maester's citadel. These two accomplishments would show that Bran has grown enough in knowledge and stature to wield the power of the three eyed raven and would be useful to the story telling process.


Season 8, what may be afoot... 

Towards the end of season 7 we see Tyrion in the corridor as Jon enters Daenary's chambers. That clumsy, fumbly and somewhat awkwardly portrayed hook up was way, way too uncomfortable to watch. What happened to the happy, fun good old romp in the sack approach to love scenes on GOT? It was the same with Missandei. This new oversensitive and overseunsualised approach is just creepy man. What Tyrion witnessed cannot be good for obvious reasons. The Lannisters are responsible for nearly all the horrors the Starks have experienced. They took Ned Starks' head, forced Arya into exile, caused Sansa much pain and caused the downward spiral of the House of Stark. Even though Tyrion himself has been treated poorly by his own House, he remains fond of his brother Jaime, and grudgingly seems to hold some affection for Cersei, he never betrayed his siblings. Jon has every reason to stand against Jaime and Cersei. Tyrion seems to recognize that with Jon in between himself and Daenary's he cannot serve her with absolute loyalty. Without this loyalty his very life is in peril and very presence in Daenary's House places him at great risk of falling out with the mother of dragons. Despite his belief in her it would seem that Tyrion has no choice but to now flee to preserve whats left of his honour, dignity and to avoid being forced to do things that are contrary to the man he has become, for very much the same reasons Jaime has fled Cersei. It is most likely Tyrion will leave Daenary's and link up with Jaime and Bron to seek their fortunes outside the royal houses and prepare in their own way for the arrival of the white walkers.

Tyrion knows his sister. He brokered the truce with her. Cersei betraying the truce must be something that has found its way into his calculus of how events could play out in the unfolding preparations for war. It stands as another reason why he may be uncomfortable remaining too close to Daenarys.  The fact that Cersei's priority is not to prepare for the night king, but to buy an army and prepare to save herself and her unborn child is a critical blow to Daenary's chances of becoming Queen of the Seven Kingdoms. With Bran petrified so late in the game even if she can win the war against the night king with only the Unsullied, Dothraki and the Northerners their numbers may be decimated or they may survive in numbers but remain exhausted after the war. At this point should they meet Cersei in a final war for the kingdoms it will be an uneven fight Dany could possibly lose as a result of Cersei's betrayal. It is most likely that this is how the end may play out simply because this makes very good story telling.

It would make sense that Tyrion would join Jaime who has broken away from Cersei to draw with him Bron and Lannister troops still loyal to him. Together they would try to put together as large an army as they can muster. This would allow Jaime who is a genius in warfare to fulfill his pledge to support the initiative against the white walkers. Tyrion would thus remain in Daenary's service but not close enough as to risk his head as she falls deeper under Jon's influence.

There is another edge to all this. Clearly the night king has built a hierarchy, a society and kingdom of his own beyond the wall. By waging war with the kingdoms south of the wall he is exposing his kingdom and placing everything he has built since the children of the forest created him at risk. The white walkers seem to be expendable pawns during battle, but the night kings lieutenants are different. They are human beings who were turned at birth. At present it is believed the night king only turns males, but this is misleading. He may be doing this for now only to build an army. North of the wall, in his kingdom there may be a sizable society consisting of many different male and female subjects of various ages, depending on when they were turned, with free will who are loyal to him. We do not understand the beliefs he shares with his people or their culture. For all we know the only reason for this war may be the fact that a special child believed to be his heir, known to his people as the hundredth child, was stolen from him. The night kings people exist through his magic. The period has come for his heir to take his place and continue that legacy allowing the magic that sustains them to enter a new cycle through the child. If the night king were to perish before doing so his people would die. If this is true the urgency of their mission and importance of Little Sam to them is likely being severely understated. This is a teaching moment for the writers of GOT, because in all likelihood the audience has the same naivety as Tarly and Gilly and are thinking c'mon an infant couldn't be the cause of a war. As people tend to do Gilly and Tarly took the child making decisions based on their own moral judgement without for a moment appreciating the importance of the infant to those whom they were taking him from, naively relegating them to being a group of walking monsters. They may have taken something thinking only of themselves and set in motion a grave problem outside their understanding. The audience may need to be shown how important the child is to the night king and his people. It may need to see the extent they are prepared to go, not just to get him back but to protect him and ensure no harm comes to him. Foreseeing this problem in visions the night king's campaign against those south of the wall may have began early and in earnest as a solution to this crisis. The night king and his people are in crisis, they not playing, they are in a struggle for their very existence against a naive, obstinate enemy who sees them as monsters or savages, whose inability to comprehend their survival is why those south of the wall are seen merely as an obstacle to their mission that must be cut down. The child he has foreseen will replace him exactly as Bran replaced the three eyed raven and will protect his people as he has done all these hundreds of years. This child is none other than Craster's baby; Gilly's child. The child currently under Tarly's protection, is a child of destiny for which kings and queens are prepared to wage war. By taking this child Tarly may have inadvertently started this war. Would it not be strange if when the night king first speaks he says something ominous like;

"You human beings are a cruel. You are bigots, racists, you turn against your own kind. Your hearts are cold and lifeless. All that you seek is for pleasure. While the few wallow in riches, your poor are plentiful and many starve because you have chosen not to learn how to care for one another. You hold nothing sacred, are heartless and behave like deprived beings with no souls thinking nothing of those whom you deem less than you, seeking only greater weapons, greater power and glory at the expense of all that must share this realm with you. For years the Wall has kept us safe away from you, but I have torn it down. We will not allow this precious child to be raised in your world."

The night king turns Craster's infant
The night king's people may face the possibility of extinction if they cannot retrieve the child. They are in a desperate situation. In the midst of this they have discovered something grave; the possible return of Azor Ahai, the one who in prophecy is seen as their mortal enemy. When they see Jon Snow for the first time his striking resemblance with the prophecy strikes fear in them. He survives death and is revived. They have become wary of him, began to watch him closely and will not waste an opportunity to confront him. Later in one of these confrontations they would discover he caries a Valerian sword and know they are growing short on time. He is a threat, but he has not as yet been taught to swathe the sword's Valerian steel in flame. Their urgency to cross the wall increases, but now they have the dragon and will make haste to take this war south of the wall to recover the infant.

Wouldn't it be odd if all this time that the audience has thought the night king and his marauding army of zombies are cursed, wretched and evil, the simple truth all along has been it is those south of the wall who consider themselves more civilized that are cold and depraved. All these years they believed the wall was keeping them safe from the white walkers, when in fact the night king and his people thought it kept them safe from humans. A tragic twist. What the night king wants back seems so simple: a child he believes is his legacy, a child he has been waiting for, for eons, a child whom he loves. Yet thousands will die if the boy is not given back. It may make absolute sense to the rest of the world to give back this one child to the night king to spare a horrible death and doom for so many. The northern lords would certainly think so. They would expect Jon's loyalty to remain with them. But this situation can become very complicated because Tarly and Gilly are close to Jon's heart. Jon,is in turn allied with Daenarys. They have become attached to Little Sam and may not be prepared to give him up, especially if they do not realize it is not the intention of the night king to harm the child but to, in his own way, adopt him. Jon whose sense of honour would not allow him to abandon his old friend would further complicate this situation. Should the rest of the world (that obviously doesn't want to die) discover this fact things could get very ugly, sides may have to be taken and it could become confusing very quickly. If Jon at first stands by Tarly it may explain why the legend of Azor Ahai strikes fear in the night king and his lieutenants. Jon wielding a fiery Valerian sword in defense of Tarly, Gilly and Little Sam together with Daenarys may lead to the fulfillment of the Azor Ahai prophecy the white walkers dread to have to face. However, even this is unlikely to deter them from their mission as there is too much at stake.

Tarly and Gilly, difficult decisions...
Its easy to imagine that after having done the impossible, that is, overcome the night king's army and survived his magic or returned Little Sam to him the incredible relief of this turn of events that ends the war with the night king would be met with the horror of having to immediately face the Golden Company, a gleaming army of fierce mercenaries raised by Cersei financed by the iron bank. An army that is rested, unscathed and skilled. It has militaristic shamans knowledgeable in how to fight and defend against magic (aka against someone like Bran or the night king). It is armed to the teeth and well provisioned. There has been a lot of talk about the lack of diversity on GOT. However, rumor has it that GRR Martin's Golden Company fights with exotic animals like elephants. Elephants are a strong feature of the African Savannah and landscape. Wouldn't it be great if the entire ten thousand strong golden company consisted of and were led by Africans with a few conscripts of different races who have joined them such as Jorah Mormont once did. They would come from a culture that understands magic, that has developed methods for fighting it, who understand what the night king is, do not fear him as much as other nations as they know how to face the peril he brings. Mormont would know them well, be able to speak their dialect and be able to advise Daenary's about them. They would speak with African accents that demonstrate somewhere in the GOT world there are other races and kingdoms beyond what audiences have seen thus far. Their art, chariots, shields, armor could be styled around that of a modernized version of the Nubians and Zulu tribe. This would be a great twist that adds to the richness of the series.

Many in the audience have been led to believe the penultimate showdown is that between the living and the dead. They seem to think after this war there will be a riding into the sunset so to speak. This confrontation will probably be epic and it may indeed seem the show is drawing to its conclusion, but just when the audience is getting cozy with this ending and thinks GOT is over because this war has been done and dusted they may be in for a shocker when they discover that this was merely a hefty prelude to the mother of all battles. After Daenary's sacrifices all that she has, she is loved by the television audience. She is a monarch who has placed the interests of her people first. And yet left with a ravaged, tired and hungry army tested by the war against the night king she must now face a highly intelligent gloating, treacherous, tyrannical and cruel (yet for some reason still likable) Cersei with a formidable army in the golden company whose fighting style and ruthlessness rivals that of the Dothraki. At this point the gobsmacked audience with their hearts in their mouths must accept Cercei is poised to win the war of the seven kingdoms, the very end game of GOT. The only way out of this mess may be a desperate ploy for Bran, Jon and company to bargain with the night king, the one person capable of raising an army at short notice, to join them against Cersei in exchange for the safe return to him of Little Sam creating both a moral dilemma and supremely tense time of crisis filled to the brim with nail biting suspense. Cersei might find her betrayal yield more than she bargained for and would now need the golden company more than ever. Even with the night kings support bargained for Daenarys it would be impossible to tell at this stage who would win this war. But hey, aren't these the kind of impossible odds, unpredictable outcomes and circumstances that create heroes and make GOT thrilling to watch?!    

How would you like Game of Thrones to end?

We have been told the 8th season is the final one.

If I were asked how I'd like GOT to end my response would be: with nearly all the main characters intact. For closure it would be nice to actually see someone take the main throne. In addition to this it would be satisfying to see the life of everyone we have gotten to know after this, where they settle and what happiness or comfort they find. Even if Cersei lost this war, for her this loss would be worse than death; it would be good to see her survive and placed in some castle or fortress which is decent but way below the station of the queen she once thought she would become. There she can be shown to give birth to the child and as he or she is placed in her arms by a nurse she might look into the child's eyes and say you will rule the seven kingdoms. Even if Cersei does become queen, then it would be Daenary's in a similar scene saying this to her child. The audience understands that just because a king or queen has been crowned that place is one that will constantly be vied for. It would be good to see someone like Arya setting off with a fleet of ships provided by the iron Islands, with someone unlikely, such as Theon Greyjoy and Lord Varys. The vessels might be shown moving into waters beyond the map of the seven kingdoms we have become accustomed to seeing. This would indicate they are sailing into the unknown. Then it would be great to see a scene where a batch of new dragon eggs are found but by people the audience does not recognize, in a place that does not look familiar.

The producers have to reconcile two things about GOT, the need for closure, but also importantly that the fans don't want to see the popular series end. The way to achieve this is to crown the king or queen of the seven kingdoms, which is really the conclusion of GOT. Having achieved closure with this ending, continuity is sustained in the audiences hearts by giving all the characters some kind of scene that shows they are moving on into the next adventure or next chapter of their lives that allows the audience feel that every ending is merely the starting point of a new beginning and in reality beautiful stories will never stop being told.

Tuesday, 8 August 2017

Spiderman Homecoming, a treat to watch



Spiderman Homecoming has some of the best writing in the movies seen this year. The story is very well thought out and put together.The cast is diverse and the actors played their roles to perfection. The collaboration between Sony and Marvel to deliver this project was a very good strategy. This is the movie you want to watch with friends. The humour is balanced, its not in every scene, its not over extended slapstick and not too overdone. There is an even balance and tempo between the comedy, the action, the serious scenes, the romance, the frustration, the contemplation and self reflection centered around Peter Parker and the people he interacts with.Its clearly targetted at a teenage or younger audience as can be observed through Peter Parker's high school going personality, but Michael Keaton does an excellent job and brings enough maturity in its delivery for an adult audience not to feel too uncomfortable about being in the cinema. This decision to split the everyday problems an adult with family and financial responsibilities has to face and the more youthful or juvenile problems faced by a teenager between Keaton and Tom Holland was a breath of fresh air. It would have been awful to sit through a broke and miserable Peter Parker in a ramshackle cockroach ridden apartment trying to make a buck by selling Spiderman photos his editor doesn't want to publish.

That said what use would this review be if it couldn't point out areas where there is still room for improvement. The very first problem that hit me watching this movie at the cinema was how poor the animated movement for Spiderman was when he first dons the suite and begins hopping from building to building. Its worse than movement in a cartoon. It may have been an attempt to capture the caricatured or stylized movement associated with Spiderman, but the movements are too quick and jerky, look very low budget and lack the realism the audience would expect from a big budget movie. This problem surfaces many times during Spiderman's action scenes. It begs the question, how could anyone in charge of the CGI have approved these shoddy or ill designed sequences? For goodness sake, don't you have experts to identify these incongruities? It looks as unpolished as a low budget movie, like an early rendition that someone forgot to finalize. Yes we know its fantasy, but that poor movement takes away from the realism or suspension of disbelief because it looks poignantly fake. It should have been spotted and corrected. In my view the low quality of the animation in these sequences threaten the quality of the entire movie; because the movie is about Spiderman, so how can it possibly have this kind of flaw? This is something management at Sony and Marvel very seriously need to address. It reminds me of the trailer for Captain America: Civil War where Falcon does a scissor kick and lands in a hero pose.  I pointed out that the quality of the transitions in those shots were too low for a trailer of such a big franchise here. Thankfully it was later corrected. But the same kind of quality problem can be seen in the mentioned sequences in Spiderman Homecoming. It is truly baffling how a movie on which investors are spending tremendous amounts of money can have such an important aspect uncorrected. This flaw forced me to keep looking for other shoddy work, but fortunately there wasn't any. Its difficult to understand why this kind of thing happens in such important franchises; that one can't help but start to conjure up conspiracy theories. What it does show is that there may have been oversight problems. One person saying o.k to something because some other person o.ked it, so it must be o.k; that right there is how unpardonable flaws make it into the final cut.

I could tell Spiderman Homecoming(SH)  would be a great movie, one of the best of the year. It was. But had a sinking feeling it would not do as well as earlier Spiderman reboots at the box office and it hasn't. Here is why. Firstly, the CGI animation problem in some sequences pointed out here with the lead character, no one less than Spiderman himself. It may not seem like a big issue, but trust me, at a deep psychological level it is and it can affect whether audiences want to see the movie more than just once. Whoever let this problem slip through holds some responsibility for the lower box office result for this movie. This should never have been allowed to happen, not at this level. Nevertheless, the jury is not out and SH may go the box office record breaking distance we all hope for it to achieve.

Secondly, the writing for SH is some of the most well thought out we've seen. That sick twist where Vulture turns out to be Liz's doting Dad was bad-ass, it unfolded to the sound of a non-discrept, warm family scene like a chilling thriller; it was easily my favourite set piece, one of the most memorable parts. However, there is one problem with the screenplay and this is that there is no consistent and cohesive build up in the showdown between Vulture and Spiderman. The audience is kept wondering until the very end whether Vulture is Spidreman's main nemesis in the movie, or maybe it should expect another even after a full reveal of Vulture and his lair. The development of Vulture and his story is excellent, its great to have real, cleverly developed villains who have a deep story of their own to tell. However, too little time is allocated to the development of the battle between Vulture and Spiderman, it doesn't feel as though the tension reaches a palpable breaking point. This is mainly because Peter Parker never gets angry enough, he doesn't develop sufficient angst to want to take the Vulture down, he's distracted by the Stark internship for far too long. Even in the car when he and Liz are being driven to the Homecoming Adrian Toomes clearly wants to take Peter down, but Peter doesn't have the same kind of eagerness to brawl with his first real nemesis hence there is little cinematic tension between the two would be foes.

There are some parts of the movie that play down the energy instead of hyping it up. For instance, go back to your high school days. If the girl you had a crush on, who just happened to be one of the prettiest girls in school said she felt the same way about you as you felt about her there would have been fireworks, hugs, very romantic eyes gazing, a kiss and so on but the audience is not served any of this despite a strong build up. Its a movie about teenagers so there should be a feel good, Grease like, ending where everyone is feeling the teenage vibe, but the closing with that awful scene where Liz is in tears, carrying a box, being punished for her father's sins, pleading with Peter was truly sour. So he gets the girl but it ends rather crappy? That wasn't well planned. The movie consequently does not comply with the rules of poetic justice. If this is the ending that was really desired Liz's experiences and personality were mismatched; she should not have been depicted as sweet, instead she should have been a mean girl who drove her father to steal, and break the law because she was spoilt and liked the finer things. You lost the plot, drained moviegoers of that "darn right, feel good" vibe, gave the audience another reason why they might not want to see it twice or three times. Even if all this is to set the audience up for the sequel, which I am looking forward to by the way, the ending is lame to say the least. This is another reason it won't perform as well as expected.

Another thing to remember about this genre, is that this is a superhero genre. Its about heroism. The mantra: "What is heroism?" should never leave a writers lips. The really tricky bit for a writer preparing material in this genre is an increasingly sophisticated audience. The urge to create a relatable hero or heroine that will resonate with audience can be so strong it blots out heroism itself, which in this genre becomes self defeating. Its very important to avoid this pitfall. Heroism means so many things to different people, be they young or old, happy or sad, protagonists or antagonists. For a young hero like Peter, coming of age emotions that evoke heroism include experiencing great fear, but going against all the dreadful feelings to face a nemesis. Feeling that overpowering urge to flee but standing your ground when everyone else is running away. Stepping in between someone innocent and their worst fear even though you know this could get ugly. Getting back up, calling out a challenge when your nemesis has licked, dissed and left you for dead to keep him or her from reaching someone you're trying to protect. At some point going all out in a rage because so many people are depending on you, and you just can't fail. The list can go on and on; a director should never forget a superhero movie is just that; no matter where the story goes or how its told at the end of the day its about heroism not just fancy stunts.    

In all director Jon Watts and his team did a stellar job. They knew what to do to make this movie sell, but may not have plucked the strings hard enough to fully hit all the emotional highs required to deliver a box office result that eclipsed earlier Spiderman movies and if they eventually are able to do this, it does not change the fact that there is still room for improvement. I do believe they will take this franchise to new heights in the sequel with a good postmortem and adequate oversight because what is most important is that, skill-wise, they have proven they have what it takes.

Sunday, 6 August 2017

The Thor:Ragnarok trailer was entertaining....




The Hulk, sporting a new haircut and holding a conversation is truly awesome, very refreshing. His CGI also looks more enhanced than we have seen before; thumbs up to that. I could be wrong but Hulk also looks less thickset, less stocky, a little leaner and a bit more GQ, its as though he is getting with the times, nice, very nice. A sexier Hulk huh? The audience certainly didn't see this coming. Very clever, I can see the ladies liking this decision by Marvel. There was a change in tone from the first trailer from being a little bit more laid back to being tighter; like the tightening of a loose guitar string to give off the right note. If the movie's tone is edited toward the second trailer the movie will be more enjoyable.

Director Taika Waititi seems to be taking this one in the right direction.  Its great to see diversity in the cast. Tessa Thomson is seen making all the right moves as Valkyrie. Thor has a large and loyal fan base, but for this movie to be a success it has to be tight. Weaknesses in previous Thor movies have stemmed from a tendency of turning Thor into a stand-up, joke telling comedian of sorts; a role that ideally should be Loki's. I've identified this problem before in Trendz, and its sad to see this mistake continue unperturbed. Yes its funny, but why is Thor the teller of lamish jokes? If Thor must tell jokes it should ideally not be because he's intentionally trying to be funny. For instance when he jokes with Bruce Banner (portrayed by Mark Rufallo) about defeating Hulk in the arena it should not appear as though he is joking, i.e. it should ideally be that he really can't stomach the fact that he was knocked about and is therefore embellishing the story. It should be funny to the audience but not to Thor himself. The way Thor bends the truth with a straight face about his encounters with Hulk is very useful for writers developing a narrative; its a useful quirk or character flaw in that if you really know Thor and he says something you know you should double check the facts or he might be having one over you. Thor pre-emptly scuttles the humour again in the part where he refers to Hulk as a friend from work. It would be funnier if Loki shouted this out and Thor turned to him with a serious expression of what the...are you talking about, this green monster is going to try to smash me into the ground. In this switch Loki is delivering the humour, Thor is the target and Hulk completes the scene. The laughter or humour is left to come from the audience. The three point methodology works. Writers can use this method over and over simply tweaking it each time. The humour should indirectly circle Thor rather than come verbally directly from him. The same applies to when he is sitting with Hulk, who refers to him as water. Thor counters that they are both fire. But he does this with a slight smile toward the end that should not be in the scene [as though he knows the gist or humour in what he saying]. This is wrong. Why? Because its unnecessarily out of character and the method of delivery for interaction between two important characters is incorrectly presented in the narrative. Thor should be stoic about what he is saying there, the laughter should come from the audience not from him. Guardians of the Galaxy (GG) 2 makes this same mistake. Yes, GG1 was refreshingly funny but this seems to have warped or skewed the method on how to build GG2. GG2  attempts to turn nearly every character into a comedian and every other scene into something comedic therefore the effectiveness of the narrative collapses on itself. The movie has great scenery, superb actors but loses the plot by putting all the characters into a comedic blender, consequently there is a significant drop in quality in the second installment of this franchise.

As a director taking over the next installment of a successful movie treat being pushed to top what was done successfully in the last movie with suspicion. Dole it out in the same quantity the audience enjoyed it at, its now your baseline. Remember if the audience liked the coffee or tea with two sugars, give it to them with two sugars in the sequel; don't put in three heap spoons like an amateur; instead the next time around add a little cinnamon in the tea and a little creamer in the coffee, but maintain two sugars. In other words absolutely look for a new angle to introduce that will captivate the audience. Don't allow yourself to fall into the trap of amplification. A very common and persisting problem in sequels today is the tendency to take an aspect of an earlier movie be it interesting story lines, explosions, romance, humour, action, special effects and so on that resonated with the audience, then go overboard trying to over amplify this in the sequel cramming it down the audience's throat until its gagging. This problem turns movies from even seasoned directors today into glossy big budget amateur hour renditions of earlier blockbusters. Its important never to lose balance. If something resonated with the audience stop constantly trying to go bigger and over the top, don't gorge on it in the sequel, instead look for that Zen feeling of self control and maintain the previous flow whilst venturing into other aspects of the movie to sustain interest through creativity or intrigue rather than over amplification. Don't be an amateur. Take a yoga lesson or a meditation class, calm down and resist the urge go bigger and badder, instead maintain the chill; but explore, go deeper,  go smoother and tighter. This is a craft, methodology in the narrative is real its not something fleeting, the foundation is no different from algebra; an x or y in the wrong place doesn't yield the desired result. Characters have individual roles and personalities, they can't just be put in a blender. Making everyone in a movie like this comedic is like putting both tennis players at Wimbledon on the same side of the court with no one on the other end  and expecting the audience to enjoy watching them play. The plot is lost; the players need to be on different ends of the court to smack the ball back and forth for the audience to have something interesting to view, similarly personalities are tentpoles that hold the narrative up by effectively playing or feeding off one another.

When Thor says they are both fire he should be pensive and frown, be seen by the audience to be at pains to be equal in strength to the Hulk and see nothing amusing about what is being said, that humour should be left to the audience otherwise the movie goes off key, like parody or a bad comedy that some people will find amusing but others will see as lame leading to potentially negative reviews. Thor should not introspectively view himself as being amusing, but this is the tone he gives off, even when narrating events during the teasers he sounds bemused; which is incorrigible really. Consequently the audience is being forced not to take him seriously. It would make sense if the bemused narrative were said in that way by Loki, the trickster making light of Thor's dire predicament. Thor's situation is dire, the impossible has happened: Hela has destroyed Mjolnir, his most prized possession.Thor has also been captured like an animal in a net, this is very serious, Thor is in a very bad place. Only Loki who is always looking for a laugh would be bemused by Thor's terrible plight. Thor has never been this down in the dumps. Put yourself in his shoes, realistically he should be in very, very low spirits....and the audience should be right down there in empathy with him...sooooo...why is he narrating what's happened to him as though he is bemused? The heaviness of the narrative is killed off instead of being expertly milked like a cash cow because the audience doesn't get a smidgen of a chance to feel his deep anguish. This is what happens when the characters are not allocated the right personalities, it affects the methodology applied in writing the scenarios. If the personalities were properly allocated this would never have happened and the humour, anguish, action and narrative would flow like a natural-born-blockbuster. Its not too late to get this right in the MCU. I'm not being negative, I'm trying to help...this is what perspective looks like.

This problem of improper delivery of humour or how to associate it with Thor's character weakened previous Thor movies. Its as though the lines between Thor and Loki's personalities and roles are being crossed in the MCU, creating a method that is difficult to sell to an audience. The persona we have seen thus far tries to portray Thor as a laid back goofy god of thunder who doesn't take himself too seriously. This is the wrong combination. It makes it difficult for the audience to appreciate how to relate to him. Ideally he should be laid back, but take himself seriously, this is the correct persona for Thor. Laid back or down to earth for him is cutting his hair, wearing earth clothes, letting his friends play around with trying to lift Mjolnir, unashamedly cutting a rug with them on the dance floor and having a beer not trying to play comedian. In the MCU lore Thor is the guy who's looks and being the god of thunder with the intimidating hammer make him seem unapproachable. This is good, because it can be counter balanced when he is "off-duty" by his being the cool guy willing to hang out with anyone rich or poor, share a beer, date a girl cause he likes her not necessarily because she's skinny or big, cute or average because he has a big heart. He's the hero who'll make friends with anyone regardless of their social status, who likes any genre of music. Being laid back in this way is what gains him respectability with the audience. Future Thor movies have to bring out this people person aspect of Thor as a sharp contrast with off-duty and on on-duty Thor. Thor's openness to people is real and proven in that he even befriends the Hulk, something many mortals would have thought impossible. Thor doesn't let differences get in the way of being there for someone. HIs friendship with the Hulk, their persistent rivalry and attempt to outdo one another resonates very well with the cinema going audience  and can be used by writers who craft these characters to create blockbusters for very long time to come. Building these aspects of Thor and teaming him up with the Hulk makes good business sense for Marvel. Allow Loki to personify the comedian, the guy with the jokes for every situation. Remember in Norse mythology Loki is after all the trickster god. He's the funny man and writers in the MCU need to get this right a.s.a.p and not mix up his role as the joker with Thor. Already Tom Hiddleston's brand of delivery makes him the best point man for writers in the MCU to write this kind humour around. This places the trio of Loki, Thor and Hulk in personas that are positioned to move like clockwork and make sense in any scenario the writers have them  face. Their interaction will consequently deliver consistent hits for Marvel.

Trust me, being a comedian or a funny man which was intended for Loki doesn't work for Thor, however, being the butt of a joke every now and again at his expense does because Thor is too cool and laid back to be affected by any kind of humour directed at him. This chemistry would work with the audience and bring Marvel the blockbusters it needs. Its really just tweaking or a careful re-positioning of the part ably brought to life by Chris Hemsworth. Its a tone thing. To hit all the right notes adjustments need to be made to Thor's persona, and how he relates to the people and events unfolding around him. You can prove this is right quite easily. Go on Youtube and study reactions to the Thor: Ragnarok trailers. Now watch to see how many people actually respond with laughter when Thor tells a joke e.g. - he's a friend from work, defeated him easily, Thor like water Hulk like fire etc. The fact that not everyone responds to this humour, that some people burst out laughing and others simply watch is a significant red flag.  If the trailers can clearly demonstrate that the humour is not hitting all the notes its a definitive indication that something needs to be done differently. To ignore it is suicidal. Tweak, tweak, tweak this...get it right or its inevitable that in the long run you will lose Thor as a significant hero in the MCU.

What to do with Hela's horns/antlers. It would be interesting if the horns could flow back like dreads and move like natural hair when she is relaxed. They would then begin to rise into place when she enters battle mode so to speak.

The part where Hela asks what Thor is the god of and he does a perfect superhero landing then comes up sprouting lightning is the business, excellent cinematic delivery.

The background music was superb. Here we go!





Looking forward to November 2017!

Black Panther: Marvel recently dropped a teaser.






Black Panther is, without doubt, the most anticipated movie of 2018.

Why is this?

Black Panther is a test case for whether the movie industry has room for this kind of diversity. Many people may believe the idea of Wakanda being the world's most technologically advanced country is hard to accept when images of dirty, starving and impoverished Africans seems to be the starter on the menu before the main course of every restaurant selling movie clips and ideas about the continent. Nevertheless, even in this poverty and struggle there is beauty, a chance to see where it all began.

What you should understand is that the world has not as yet felt the full weight, might, force and presence of Africa. At present, the majority of Africans struggle for the most basic of needs. There is very little room to apply effort and time to anything else. However, as the tide turns and the continent finds its feet this effort and time will exert itself fully and unwaveringly on every field of science and technology, infrastructure, entrepreneurship, architecture, medicine, information technology, mining, space travel, sport, athletics,  art, literature, dance, entertainment and so on. Africans lack neither intellectual nor physical prowess. Thus far the world has only seen snippets of this potential. You have not seen anything yet. But be prepared for the continent to overwhelm the world in every field of human endeavour, and dominate in ways that may lead to some frustration to those on the receiving end, not because there's anything different than anyone else about Africans but simply because the continent's potential is currently smothered, unseen, understated and far from being realised. Be patient and let the continent get its house in order. Instead of lamenting how Africa is problematic and lagging behind the rest of the world, instead there will come a time when the world will be grateful for and understand why it was given a head start. And don't be upset if, when this potential is inevitably realised, for a very long time, there is absolutely nothing you can beat Africans at. Nothing. The idea of a fictional Wakanda would seem to point to that potential as a kind of reminder that the continent should not be written off as many tend to do today .....rather be patient, supportive and wait for it....because its coming your way like a cool refreshing breeze on a hot summer's day.

DC's Wonder Woman right now has completely changed the game when it comes to female superheroes. My view was that if this happened Marvel would have to up its game in this area. And this is something the Dora Milaje (DM), if carefully handled by Coogler can do for the Franchise, but the clips shown in this regard, of the DM, were not inspiring. Let me elaborate on this. The casting is second to none with the likes of Lupita Nyong'o, Florence Kasumba, Danai Gurira, Nabiyah Be etc. The context, what they portray and how they portray it is what is important. There must be some intrigue associated with the DM. They are not ordinary one dimensional body guards. They have views, feelings, commentary on what they observe (as women) and very importantly a side of them that shows a human side and life when they are off-duty and the potentially unstoppable mercenaries they will become when they are on-duty, also the transition from off-duty to on-duty, from civilian clothes to uniform that might resemble the wiles of a busy dressing room of models before they go on the runway rather than army barracks, sides that are as different as night and day that add to the attraction and intrigue that follows them. When the audience sees a DM on duty it should see her and know there is another human side to her. If director Ryan Coogler gets this, then he definitely has a major hit in his capable hands. Think of the Dora Milaje as the mothers of Africa, in a Black Panther Wakanda showdown what would they be the most concerned about (that the men might overlook) while stylishly, fiercely and fearlessly protecting their leader. Other than this...

the trailer, by the way,....was on point.

The background music was fantastic!





Be careful not to give too much about the coming movie away through the trailers.....

Monday, 24 July 2017

Thanos and the Infinity War: Building up the Suspense

Thanos Arrives.
The beat down. You shouldn't have messed with Hela.

With each movie from Marvel a new brushstroke adds to the painting that will eventually become the Infinity War. According to Marvel's plan we are now in Phase 3, which thus far in 2017 the audience has yet to watch Thor: Ragnarok. This will lead to Black Panther in 2018 and the Infinity War in May 2018, Antman and the Wasp 2018, Captain Marvel 2019 and Avengers 4; 2019.

As a member of the audience it sometimes feels as though we don't know enough about Thanos. In terms of the progress towards the Infinity War the story of the good guys, the Avengers, has been well told and as the suspense builds up it would be nice if under the mastery of Kevin Feige in Phase 3 the Infinity War movies were pushed back in order to include a Thanos stand alone movie. This would allow the audience to fully receive and comprehend Thanos' backstory. If you don't know anything about Thanos which is likely to be the case for a good deal of the audience there's a lot of information about him available on the internet, for example here.

Thanos has a very intriguing backstory. Its a little graphic, but all it needs is to be humanized for the audience to identify with him as the protagonist rather than the antagonist. For instance, at birth Thanos is born with physical features that are different from the Eternals and that affects his relationship with them. Eventually this has a strong impact on his personality. He is not necessarily born evil, but his being physically different and falling short of the standard of beauty held by Eternals, the life experiences he encounters through the formative years slowly turns him from a likable child into an Eternal who's views on morality, life and death have become "justifiably" jaded or twisted especially,  when the one woman who embraces him, treats him as someone beautiful, shows him affection, who makes him laugh and know true love,  allows his self esteem to grow until it becomes egotistical is the mistress of death, presumably Hela. It would be great if Hela were Thanos' childhood companion. Whereas the other children in the "playground" would tease and shun him, isolate him, she would instead befriend him. She would often have to shield or console him such that his attachment to her grew immeasurably. Thanos' feelings for Hela in the audience's mind are thus made real and relatable. This could be portrayed and would unfold cinematically. Over time Thanos befriends others who feel like outsiders who eventually become the crew with which he arrives in the Infinity War. In the same way that the Avengers assemble as a result of the personal connections and friendships that develop, antagonists like Thanos and company develop groups for similar reasons. They care about each other, defend one another, dive into harms way to protect one another, don't like to see team members hurt and feel each other's pain. Thanos would then be seen to closely follow the news that Hela is rumoured to be on earth as Thor: Ragnarok unfolds.

Hela goes up against the Avengers in Thor Ragnarok and is most likely defeated. After her defeat , lets say she is trapped or imprisoned in some way by the Avengers. What profound effect would this have on Thanos? Put it this way. Everyone in the audience thinks Thanos is coming to earth to complete the Infinity Gauntlet. But, put yourself in Thanos' shoes, if you were going about your business and heard your girlfriend had been knocked about and tied up by a bunch of so called heroes in spandex; how would you react? Get my point. You would drop everything you were doing, tell your squad where to meet you and gun for the earth. And when you got there all hell was going to break loose. This angle would resonate with the audience. Nevertheless, as was observed of Batman Vs Superman a better trailer than the last one does not necessarily mean the movie itself has been improved.

It would make more sense to the audience if Thanos wanted the Infinity stones to impress and avenge Hela, and free her than if he wanted them simply for the sake of having great power. To seek the infinity stones simply for the sake of power would make Thanos seem too simple, too one dimensional. Furthermore, it may be a good idea to explore the fact that a person wearing the Infinity Gauntlet is undefeatable. Its power is so immense that it simply cannot be taken from the bearer. To assume anyone can pull the gauntlet off anyone wearing it is weak. The gauntlet cannot be taken by trickery or by force. The only means to defeat the person who wears the Infinity Gauntlet is to make them take it off by themselves, willingly. Since the gauntlet makes Thanos too powerful to take on physically, then Hela may prove to be the only means at the disposal of the Avengers to make him choose to take it off. Every villain and hero has a weakness, an angle through which they can be defeated. Life and death exist in a balance. Though at first Thanos' destruction spreads death it unravels this balance too deeply threatening to permanently destroy both life and death, existence itself. The Avengers recognize this, give Thanos and his crew a hard time but he just keeps coming back, proves undefeatable. As everything falls apart Hela begins to see and sense that if all life in the universe must end then so too must death as one has no meaning without the other. She begins to understand that this plan is flawed. However, at this point in his campaign to free Hela and please her with limitless death Thanos does not see things have gone too far. Defeated the Avengers must do the unthinkable: plead with Hela to confront Thanos by seeing reason and understanding what this means. Hela seeing the problem at hand must now go against her own inclinations and confront Thanos, with the Avengers. But he has become so consumed by the objective and the high of wielding the Infinity Gauntlet that her first attempts to get through to Thanos fail. There are only brief intermittent moments in the battle where Thanos is momentarily weakened enough for her to communicate with him. When she breaks through its as though they converse in a dream. She reminds him of their past. In each brief moment she is able to reach Thanos a little more. She reasons with him, but he counters her arguments with his own sensible responses, refuses to back down and forces her out. The battle rages on. Hela doesn't relent. She finds her way back into his thoughts and calls on their past, the quiet times, the good times. Until finally he sees her. At last, he lets her pull the Infinity Gaunlet from his hand. In that twinkling the fastest member of the Avengers retrieves the Gauntlet, but Hela and Thanos are too intense to notice it being spirited away, Hela teleports herself and Thanos away...or something like that. The Gauntlet is then later used by the Avengers to restore the destruction and lives it decimated.

The only force capable of disarming Thanos is love.
This is confirmed by his backstory.

It makes financial sense for Marvel to have Hela play a substantive role in the Infinity War when it comes to the Avengers taking on Thanos. Women constitute a significant proportion of the audience. Psychologically they will identify with leading actresses in a movie and become more involved in the unfolding story arch if there is a strong female role in a movie. It does not matter whether the female role is of a protagonist or antagonist, the quality of presentation for the character is what attracts the female audience when the feminine nuances portrayed by the actor, guided by the director are done properly. If you want some proof of this working watch the Thor: Ragnarok trailer reactions on youtube and study the responses of the female audience when Hela appears with nuance excellently expressed by Kate Blanchet, for instance, when she runs her hands over her shoulders sensuously and this changes the design of her suite antlers and all, its strong, its womanly, there is certainly a connection made with the female audience and some excitement there that can be observed in the trailer reactions. A director has to be able to identify movement done by a male or female hero that is appealing. For instance when Thor stands up toward the end of the trailer with lighting in his eyes, his posture and the manner in which he rises is very masculine, it is intimidating but it would be a mistake to have a female hero rise with this same posture even though the very same message were being conveyed. Creating super hero's is an art. This is nuance. The difference between genius and mediocrity.

Thanos has a fantastic backstory that is financially viable to Marvel. It would make sense to include this brush stroke. Then when the Infinity War begins through empathy Thanos should ideally have some people, if not routing for him, at least able to appreciate why he and the Avengers are going to war as will be the case in the Infinity War.

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

I've seen a few flicks just now...

Wonder Woman...Is in the House!

An amazing Gal.


Wonder woman  (WW), well...what can be said. Well done. Finally a female superhero is truly reborn. As a kid I was fan of Linda Carter as WW, and now Gal Gadot. Wow. Make no mistake bringing out a female super hero successfully is a complex mathematical formula and Director Patty Jenkins got it right. Lets raise a glass to her and her team. The magic is back. Now if only we can get back that chorus crying out "Wonder Woman" from the 1975 Wonder Woman theme song during some of Gal Gardot's WW's feats of bravery, that right .... there would be the bag of chips.

The early direction of WW seemed off, beginning with the costume and I was among those who weren't too enthusiastic about it. (read about here). The red, gold and blue colours in WW costume are back. Someone smart listened to the audience. A female superhero is not a male superhero. Its not easy for a director to understand what makes a female superhero attractive to men and inspirational to other women. There are specific nuances the director has connect with and display through the protagonist. A female superhero embraces the power in her femininity, what she worries about, how she views the world around her, her strength, her appearance, what she wears, how she wears it, how she carries herself, her poise and so on. She doesn't want to be a man, because she believes in the power of being a woman and knows that's all she needs to succeed and she doesn't need to diminish herself by bashing men to do it. Phenomenally Patty was able to fend off the irresistible urge to focus on the attributes usually associated with male super heroes.


Patty Jenkins is one of the only directors to understand and
implement the differences in expression and nuance that
distinguish a female superhero from a male superhero that have
made Wonder Woman a success at the box office.
The opening scene with the naughty, energetic little girl was a stroke of genius. Every Dad would see his daughter in that little girl, anyway. I did. Not only does the audience see the evolution of Diana's physical ability, it also see's how her personality grows form a magical kind of innocence into a defender of what she believes. Finally she battles an all-powerful being who is personified in many parts, he is a humble man, a politician, an unlikely foe initially presented as a friend with an agenda all his own. A worthy well crafted antagonist, not the lazy ramshackle Doomsday nonsense we were forced to endure in BvS. He not only challenges her physically, but mentally, not only attacks her physically but during confrontation tries to break her down mentally and emotionally, in a no holds barred showdown. She is fighting as much with her mind, emotions and feelings as she is with her fists as Ares tries relentlessly to turn her to his side - excellent. How powerful is Wonder Woman? The movie answers this question: Nobody really knows. Diana is and becomes as powerful as she believes she is and needs to be. This too is refreshing. The audience doesn't seem to know if a bullet will harm her...or not, if the flames will burn her...or not, if those rocks will crush her...or not, if that gas will choke her...or not. This tends to imply her vulnerability is driven by what she thinks of her environment, what she sees, feels and rationalises about it. This vulnerability was identified by gladiator and trainer Antiope, ably portrayed by Robin Wright. It does not matter how powerful or invincible you are, when you lose hope and give up on yourself you can be defeated, injured, even by antagonists much weaker, shallower, less determined, less deserving  and less worthy than you. This is relatable. It is very clever as the audience is forced to worry about her state of mind knowing that if she doesn't properly feel or rationalise a challenge and draw strength from self belief it could weaken and hurt her, but if she makes the realest choice she will be unstoppable. What can be more human than this? Its pure genius.

DC is on its way. Its clear that an effort was made to introduce some diversity in the cast of WW by filling it in, in ways that the casting and script did not make room for. This took something away from the power of the movie. The diversity was very much beside the scenes, standing by, a side dish type of offering that is not very inspiring to other races and cultures. Hopefully this can be improved in the next WW.